Academic Handbook Course Descriptors and Programme Specifications
LENGL6254 Final Project: Comparative Literature Dissertation Course Descriptor
Course code | LENGL6254 | Discipline | English |
UK Credit | 30 | US Credit | 8 |
FHEQ level | 6 | Date approved | November 2022 |
Core attributes | CPPC
FP |
||
Pre-requisites | This course is only available to students for whom English is their main degree discipline | ||
Co-requisites |
Course Overview
This course embraces interdisciplinarity by questioning, and inviting students to look beyond, the linguistic and disciplinary barriers suggested by the subject title: English. The dissertation requires students to bring an Anglophone work of literature into critical comparison with at least one other cultural object – literary or otherwise – and to identify, evaluate and choose between various potential methodologies to achieve this. The course is predicated on, and seeks to inculcate, ethical principles and practices that are inherent in cultural comparativism, and which foster citizenship and self-actualisation: impartiality, empiricism, openness to unfamiliar modes of thinking and feeling, mediation between different cultures and languages (taking those terms both more and less literally – as a novel, for example, may have a ‘culture’ and a ‘language’ of its own), the placing of everything in its own contexts, the perception of both commonality between things which are apparently different and of differences between things which are apparently similar, and the disposition both to celebrate commonality and to respect difference, whilst holding in relationship a simultaneous sense of both.
Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of the course, students will be able to:
Knowledge and Understanding
K3c | Identify the similarities and differences between, and critically reflect on the relationship of, different cultural objects, and the contexts and discourses which they variously represent.
|
Subject Specific Skills
S1c | Write a piece of advanced comparative cultural analysis using an appropriate selected methodology. |
Transferable and Employability Skills
T1c | Use oral presentation to persuade a live audience of the validity and interest of a project, communicating ideas and insights from the discipline in public and professional contexts. |
T2c | Frame a productive project, requiring in-depth independent research, and bring it to effective completion. |
T3c
|
Display an advanced level of technical proficiency in written English and competence in applying scholarly terminology, so as to be able to apply skills in critical evaluation, analysis and judgement effectively in a diverse range of contexts. |
Teaching and Learning
This course has a dedicated Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) page with a range of resources to orientate the student and provide support for their directed study.
The teaching and learning activities for this course are: 14 scheduled hours.
Indicative example:
- 12 hours of seminars / workshops
- 2 hours of 1:1 or small-group meetings
- Office Hours (up to 4 short meetings)
Faculty hold regular ‘office hours’, which are opportunities for students to drop in or sign up to explore ideas, raise questions, or seek targeted guidance or feedback, individually or in small groups.
Students are to attend and participate in all the scheduled teaching and learning activities for this course and to manage their directed learning and independent study.
Indicative total learning hours for this course: 300
Assessment
Both formative and summative assessment are used as part of this course, with purely formative opportunities typically embedded within interactive teaching sessions or office hours.
Summative Assessments
The presentation requires students to present – and answer questions – on their work in a manner that persuades the audience of the interest of their chosen project, and of the validity of the critical methodology selected to bring the cultural objects concerned into relationship. The dissertation (submitted as a portfolio) requires students to critically co-examine two or more cultural objects (at least one of which must be an Anglophone literary text) by reflecting on their respective relevant contexts, similarities, differences, and mutual relationship, with the aid of appropriate selected methodology.
AE: | Assessment Activity | Weighting (%) | Duration | Length |
1 | Presentation | 25% | 12 mins | N/A |
2 | Portfolio | 75% | N/A | 7,000 |
Further information about the assessments can be found in the Course Syllabus.
Feedback
Students will receive formative and summative feedback in a variety of ways, written (e.g. marked up on drafts or through email) or oral (e.g. as part of interactive teaching sessions or in office hours).
Indicative Reading
Note 1: the required and recommended reading and any other resources will be agreed in writing based on an initial discussion between the student and their supervisor.
Note 2. The indicative additional reading list provided below is for a general guide and part of the approval/modification process only.
- Apter, E.S., The Translation Zone: A New Comparative Literature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006)
- Bassnett, S., Comparative Literature: A Critical Introduction (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993)
- Bernheimer, C. (ed.), Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995)
- Greetham, B. How to Write Your Undergraduate Dissertation (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009)
Indicative Topics
Note: the topic and provisional title will be agreed in writing based on an initial discussion between the student and their supervisor.
Title: LENGL6254 Final Project: Comparative Literature Dissertation Course Descriptor
Approved by: Academic Board Location: Academic Handbook/Programme Specifications and Handbooks/Undergraduate Programmes |
|||||
Version number | Date approved | Date published | Owner | Proposed next review date | Modification (As per AQF4) & category number |
1.1 | February 2023 | July 2023 | Dr Catherine Brown | November 2027 | 1.1 Category 1: Corrections/clarifications to documents which do not change approved content or learning outcomes |
1.0 | November 2022 | January 2023 | Dr Catherine Brown | November 2027 |