Academic Handbook Course Descriptors and Programme Specifications
LPHIL5279 Intermediate Philosophy Directed Study I Course Descriptor
Last modified on May 28th, 2024 at 1:16 pm
| Course code | LPHIL5279 | Discipline | Philosophy |
| UK Credit | 15 | US Credit | 4 |
| FHEQ level | 5 | Date approved | May 2023 |
| Core attributes | [Where a Directed Study relates to a challenge, figure, or topic from another course, it will (unless otherwise stated) have the same Core attributes as that other course.] | ||
| Pre-requisites | [Where a Directed Study relates to a challenge, figure, or topic from another course, it will (unless otherwise stated) have the same pre-requisites as that other course.] | ||
| Co-requisites | [Where a Directed Study relates to a challenge, figure, or topic from another course, it will (unless otherwise stated) have the same co-requisites as that other course.] | ||
|
Exclusions |
Multiple Directed Studies on the same challenge, figure, or topic cannot be taken at the same level and in the same discipline (and even at different levels or disciplines, only with explicit permission) within the same Degree Programme. | ||
Course Overview
This course provides students with an opportunity to undertake in-depth work on an agreed challenge, figure, or topic in Philosophy, under the guidance of an assigned faculty tutor. It has its own syllabus and online learning resources, including detailed guidance, rubrics, and structured assignments to facilitate progress.
The challenge, figure, or topic will typically be drawn from another course, the syllabus and learning resources for which are available to the student to orientate and provide context for their study.
Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of the course, students will be able to:
Knowledge and Understanding
| K1b | Describe, organise and discuss key information about a specific challenge, figure, or topic in Philosophy and its / their relevance in the wider discipline. |
| K2b | Critically engage with competing approaches in the scholarly literature relating to the challenge, figure, or topic. |
Subject Specific Skills
| S1b | Apply well-established analytical, evaluative or interpretative techniques or frameworks from the discipline to the specific challenge, figure, or topic. |
| S2b | Deploy appropriate vocabulary from the discipline to engage in informed critical argument or discussion about the challenge, figure, or topic. |
Transferable and Employability Skills
| T1b | Communicate clearly and persuasively, using a range of formats. |
| T2b | Research and study independently and effectively. |
| T3b | Demonstrate a sound technical proficiency in written English and skill in selecting relevant vocabulary. |
Teaching and Learning
This course has a syllabus and online learning resources, including detailed guidance, assessment criteria, and structured assignments to facilitate progress.
Directed Study
The teaching and learning activities for this course are:
- Scheduled hours:
- 2 tutorial hours (or 1.5 tutorial hours if 1:1)
- 6 workshop hours
- 142 private study hours (with regular structured assignments)
Faculty hold regular Office Hours, which are opportunities for students to drop in or sign up to explore ideas, raise questions, or seek targeted guidance or feedback, individually or in small groups.
Students are expected to attend and participate in all the teaching and learning activities for this course and to manage their directed learning and private study.
Indicative total learning hours: 150
Assessment
Both formative and summative assessment are used as part of this course, with purely formative opportunities typically embedded within interactive teaching sessions or office hours.
Summative Assessments
| AE: | Assessment Activity | Weighting (%) | Duration | Length |
| 1 | Set Exercises | 40% | N/A | 1,500 words (or equivalent, as may be relevant if includes artefacts or presentations) |
| 2 | Written Assignment | 60% | N/A | 2,000 words |
Further information about the assessments can be found in the Course Syllabus.
Feedback
Students will receive formative and summative feedback in a variety of ways, written (e.g. marked up on drafts or through email) or oral (e.g. as part of interactive teaching sessions or in office hours).
Indicative Reading
Note: the required and recommended reading for a specific instance of the course will be agreed in writing between the student and the assigned faculty by the start of the course.
Indicative Topics
Note: the challenge, figure, or topic of a specific instance of the course will be agreed in writing between the student and the assigned faculty by the start of the course.
| Title: LPHIL5279 Intermediate Philosophy Directed Study I
Approved by: Academic Board Location:academic-handbook/programme-specifications-and-handbooks/undergraduate-programmes |
|||||
| Version number | Date approved | Date published | Owner | Proposed next review date | Modification (As per AQF4) & category number |
| 1.0 | May 2023 | June 2023 | Dr Brian Ball | May 2028 | |