Academic Handbook Course Descriptors and Programme Specifications

LPHIL7261 Philosophy Project-Based Dissertation Course Descriptor

Course Code LPHIL7261 Faculty Philosophy
UK Credit 60 US Credit N/A
FHEQ Level Level 7
Core Attributes N/A
Pre-requisites LPHIL7251 Mind and Reality, LPHIL7253 Values and Society, LPHIL7252 Artificial Intelligence and Data Ethics, LPHIL7254 Minds and Machines
Co-requisites None

Course Overview

This course provides students with the opportunity to complete a Master’s dissertation project which does not fit within the constraints of a typical Philosophical dissertation. This course supports students in undergoing a project which tackles a real-world problem using techniques from Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence and other disciplines.  The aim of this course is to support students’ ability to devise original solutions to a problem, to give experience of managing a project, and extend students’ ability to present their ideas clearly.

The project can cover a wide spectrum of topics taught in the programme and can take a wide variety of forms. The student may analyse a real-world problem relevant to their background and provide relevant, legal,  policy or business recommendations. The project may involve the input from an external stakeholder, such as a company, not-for-profit, or government body. The student may also apply data analytics, computational tools, or empirical research methods to a philosophical problem. The project may be highly interdisciplinary in nature, but all projects must engage substantially with the relevant philosophical literature. Such interdisciplinary projects will typically get assigned two supervisors: (i) an expert from the Philosophy discipline and (ii) an expert from another discipline.

After an initial group seminar with the course leader, students meet with their assigned supervisor(s) to finalise the subject of their project and discuss and refine its requirements. Once the dissertation has been submitted, students give a presentation of the project and answer questions about it in a 50-minute oral assessment and presentation.

Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of the course, students will be able to:

Knowledge and Understanding

K1d Identify, analyse, and interpret requirements to solve a problem rigorously (e.g., formulate a thesis statement, identify steps required to solve it, substantiate your findings with data, identify relevant literature, form an argument).
K2d Demonstrate detailed critical engagement with methods, tools and technologies required to solve a problem (e.g., philosophical devices or software libraries).
K3d Demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of empirical and/or conceptual research methods.
K4d Critical review of related work, identifying key developments in a particular area, opportunities for integration, limitations and avenues for further development and innovation.

Subject Specific Skills

S1d Ability to engage in a peer review process that involves critical review of ideas, arguments, software and related documentation, coupled with positive actions advice for improvement and innovation.
S2d Ability to recognise the individual components required to solve a problem or answer a question and combine them into a coherent argument or solution.
S3d Develop original arguments based on solid background work and coupled with positive actions for improvement and innovation.

Transferable and Employability Skills

T1d Display project leadership skills, from understanding a problem to proposing a solution based on sound insights.
T2d Source, organise, and synthesise information from various disciplines, question assumptions, and engage with competing arguments.
T3d Be able to communicate across disciplinary boundaries and defend one’s ideas in a viva voce examination.
T4d Consistently apply an excellent level of technical proficiency in written English, using an advanced application of scholarly terminology, that demonstrates the ability to deal with complex issues both systematically and with sophistication.

Teaching and Learning

This course has a dedicated Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) page with a syllabus and range of additional resources (e.g. readings or other resources, assignment briefs, discussion boards, signposting to Academic Writing support) to orientate and engage students in their studies.

Teaching and learning strategies for this course will include: Up to 3 hours of group workshops and a set of 1:1 supervision sessions (3-5 individual sessions throughout the process).

Faculty hold regular ‘office hours’, which are opportunities for students to drop in or sign up to explore ideas, raise questions, or seek targeted guidance or feedback, individually or in small groups.

Students are to attend and participate in all the scheduled teaching and learning activities for this course and to manage their directed learning and independent study.

Indicative total learning hours for this course: 600 hours including independent work hours.

Employability Skills

Completing a Master’s dissertation in philosophy cultivates skills that are employable across a range of sectors. These include the abilities to:

  • Work independently, creatively, and to deadlines
  • Conduct research and explore relevant existing knowledge
  • Analyse, contextualise, and interpret complex ideas and materials
  • Synthesise and evaluate information against a backdrop of uncertainty
  • Solve problems through logical reasoning
  • Present findings and opinions in a clear, structured manner, whether orally or in writing
  • Engage in collaborative and constructive discussion

Assessment

Formative

Students’ successive partial drafts will be formatively assessed during the course. These assessments do not count towards the end of year results, but will provide students with developmental feedback, both written and oral.

Summative

AE: Assessment Activity Weighting (%) Duration Length
1 Project Proposal 20% N/A 3,000 words
2 Dissertation 60% N/A 8,000 words
3 Oral Assessment* 20% 50 minutes N/A

*Oral Assessments are a compulsory pass, see AQF7 Academic Regulations, Part C: Assessment Regulations.

Feedback

Students will receive formal feedback in a variety of ways: written (in comments on draft material, including via email correspondence); oral (within one-to-one supervision tutorials, and on an ad hoc basis).

Feedback is provided on summative assessment and is made available to the student either via email, the VLE or another appropriate method.

Indicative Reading

Reading is to be decided upon between student and supervisor, depending on the chosen dissertation topic.

Indicative Topics

The topics to be covered will vary between dissertations, but typically the student will proceed in the following stages:

  • Proposal
  • First Draft
  • Second Draft
  • Third Draft
  • Final Draft
  • Submission
  • Viva Voce Exam

Version History

Title: LPHIL7261 Philosophy Project-Based Dissertation Course Descriptor

Approved by: Academic Board

Location: Academic Handbook/Programme specifications and Handbooks/ Postgraduate Programme Specifications/MA Philosophy Programme Specification/Philosophy Course Descriptors

Version number Date approved Date published Owner Proposed next review date Modification (As per AQF4) & category number
1.0 July 2024 July 2024 Dr Tom Beevers April 2029