Academic Handbook Course Descriptors and Programme Specifications

NCHNAP692 Data Science Synoptic Project and End Point Assessment Course Descriptor

Course Title Data Science Synoptic Project and End Point Assessment Faculty EDGE Innovation Unit (London)
Course code NCHNAP692 Course Leader Professor Scott Wildman (interim)
Credit points 60 Teaching Period This course will typically be delivered over a 6-month period.
FHEQ level 6 Date approved June 2020
Compulsory/
Optional 
Compulsory
Prerequisites None

Course Summary

This module is a data science project, conceived and executed by the learner in an external organisation. The project will demonstrate a high-level of technical and analytical skill, aligned to achieving organisational goals and enabling effective institutional change. The project may focus on any element of the data science workflow and will culminate with a dissertation. The dissertation will combine technical research with organisational needs and project management and will enable the learner to deepen his or her understanding of a particular area of data science. Project assessment includes a compulsory knowledge test and professional discussion (viva voce examination) at the end of the process, as per the end point assessment for apprenticeships (see EPA for Data Scientist [Integrated Degree] apprenticeship, for more details). 

Course Aims

  • Give learners the opportunity to carry out independent research and in-depth analysis in data science.
  • Train learners to write up their findings and ideas clearly, coherently and to a high-professional standard.
  • Train learners to present their own arguments logically and competently, to engage specialist and non-specialist stakeholders.

Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of the course, learners will be able to:

Knowledge and Understanding

K1c Reflect, in depth, on the body of academic knowledge in a particular specialist field of data science.
K2c Understand how to systematically apply critical analysis and the appropriate data science methodologies to achieve a successful outcome.

Subject Specific Skills

S1c Apply project delivery techniques and appropriate tools to plan, organise and manage resources to successfully run the project.
S2c Communicate and disseminate project findings through high impact, creative storytelling, tailored to specialist and non-specialist audiences.

Transferable and Professional Skills

T1c Use academic and industry-specialist literature to build an argument and carry out sophisticated analysis of the chosen topic.
T2c Present findings concisely and clearly.
T3ci Make meaningful conclusions on the basis of a long period of independent study.
T3cii Display an advanced level of technical proficiency in written English and competence in applying scholarly terminology, so as to be able to apply skills in critical evaluation, analysis and judgement effectively in a diverse range of contexts.

Teaching and Learning

The contact hours on this course are formed predominantly of supervisory meetings, typically 4 x 1 hour.

Learners are expected to carry out independent research into the topic. Readings should include a mix of books, journal articles, policy papers and other relevant documents, depending on the topic and the approach taken in the dissertation.

Course information and supplementary materials are available on the University’s Virtual Learning Environment (VLE).

Learners are required to attend and participate in all the formal and timetabled sessions for this course. Learners are also expected to manage their directed learning and independent study in support of the course.

The course learning and teaching hours will be structured as follows:

  • Off-the-job learning (18 days x 7 hours) = 126 hours (e.g. 1 day per week for 18 weeks)
  • On-the-job learning (54 days x 7 hours) = 378 hours (e.g. 3 days per week for 18 weeks)
  • Private study (5 hours per week for 18 weeks) = 90 hours

Assessment

Formative

Learners will be formatively assessed during the course by means of a project plan review. This will not count towards the final degree but will provide learners with developmental feedback. 

Summative

Assessment will be in two forms:

AE   Assessment Type Weighting Online submission Duration Length
1 Examination (MCQ) 20% Yes 1 hour
2 Dissertation 50% Yes 7,500 words +/- 10%
3 Oral Assessment 30% Yes 90 mins +/- 10%

 

AE1 must be successfully completed (passed) before AE 2 & AE3 can be attempted. AE2 must be attempted (submitted) before AE3 can be attempted.

Feedback

Learners will receive formal feedback in a variety of ways: written (via email or VLE correspondence) and indirectly through online discussion groups. Learners will also attend a formal meeting with their Academic Mentor (and for apprentices, including their Line Manager). These bi- or tri-partite reviews will monitor and evaluate the learner’s progress.

Indicative Reading

Note: Comprehensive and current reading lists for courses are produced annually in the Course Guide or other documentation provided to learners; the indicative reading list provided below is used as part of the approval/modification process only.

Books

  • Walliman, N., (2004), Your Undergraduate Dissertation: The Essential Guide for Success, London: Sage.
  • Swetnam, D., (2001), Writing Your Dissertation: How to Plan, Prepare and Present Your Work Successfully, Begbroke: How To Books Ltd.

Journals

Learners are encouraged to consult relevant journals on their relevant specialism.

Electronics Resources

Learners are encouraged to consult relevant electronic resources on their relevant specialism.

Indicative Topics

  • How to solve a technological problem based on an organisation’s problem
  • Managing technology projects to a successful outcome
  • Using real-world data and scenarios
Title: NCHNAP692 Data Science Synoptic Project and End Point Assessment

Approved by: Academic Board

Location: Academic Handbook/Programme specifications and Handbooks/ Undergraduate Apprenticeship Programmes/BSc (Hons) Data Science Programme Specification/Course Descriptors

Version number Date approved Date published  Owner Proposed next review date Modification (As per AQF4) & category number
3.1 April 2023 April 2023 Scott Wildman September 2026 Category 1: Corrections/clarifications to documents which do not change approved content or learning outcomes.
3.0 October 2022 January 2023 Scott Wildman September 2026 Category 1: Corrections/clarifications to documents which do not change approved content or learning outcomes

Category 3: Changes to Learning Outcomes

2.1 May 2022 May 2022 Scott Wildman September 2025 Category 1:
Corrections/clarifications to
documents which do not
change approved content.
2.0 January 2022 April 2022 Scott Wildman September 2026 Category 3: Changes to Learning Outcomes
1.0 June 2020 June 2020 Scott Wildman June 2025
Print/Save PDF